<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>tailscale/util/execqueue/execqueue_test.go, branch bradfitz/mutex_debug</title>
<subtitle>The easiest, most secure way to use WireGuard and 2FA</subtitle>
<id>http://git.waynecole.info/tailscale/atom?h=bradfitz%2Fmutex_debug</id>
<link rel='self' href='http://git.waynecole.info/tailscale/atom?h=bradfitz%2Fmutex_debug'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://git.waynecole.info/tailscale/'/>
<updated>2025-11-26T18:09:23Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>util/execqueue: don't hold mutex in RunSync</title>
<updated>2025-11-26T18:09:23Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Brad Fitzpatrick</name>
<email>bradfitz@tailscale.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-11-26T17:26:08Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://git.waynecole.info/tailscale/commit/?id=8af7778ce04457a5f84a45e7cc8f58f02b7bfb4c'/>
<id>urn:sha1:8af7778ce04457a5f84a45e7cc8f58f02b7bfb4c</id>
<content type='text'>
We don't hold q.mu while running normal ExecQueue.Add funcs, so we
shouldn't in RunSync either. Otherwise code it calls can't shut down
the queue, as seen in #18502.

Updates #18052

Co-authored-by: Nick Khyl &lt;nickk@tailscale.com&gt;
Change-Id: Ic5e53440411eca5e9fabac7f4a68a9f6ef026de1
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick &lt;bradfitz@tailscale.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>control/controlclient,util/execqueue: extract execqueue into a package</title>
<updated>2024-01-18T20:08:13Z</updated>
<author>
<name>James Tucker</name>
<email>james@tailscale.com</email>
</author>
<published>2024-01-18T18:33:20Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://git.waynecole.info/tailscale/commit/?id=38a1cf748a9920aa2cb49101730bba06db1fd839'/>
<id>urn:sha1:38a1cf748a9920aa2cb49101730bba06db1fd839</id>
<content type='text'>
This is a useful primitive for asynchronous execution of ordered work I
want to use in another change.

Updates tailscale/corp#16833
Signed-off-by: James Tucker &lt;james@tailscale.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
