| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The cloner's codegen for map[K][]*V fields was doing a shallow
append (copying pointer values) instead of cloning each element.
This meant that cloned structs aliased the original's pointed-to
values through the map's slice entries.
Mirror the existing standalone-slice logic that checks
ContainsPointers(sliceType.Elem()) and generates per-element
cloning for pointer, interface, and struct types.
Regenerate net/dns and tailcfg which both had affected
map[...][]*dnstype.Resolver fields.
Fixes #19284
Signed-off-by: Andrew Dunham <andrew@tailscale.com>
|
|
The cloner and viewer code generators didn't handle named types
with basic underlying types (map/slice) that have their own Clone
or View methods. For example, a type like:
type Map map[string]any
func (m Map) Clone() Map { ... }
func (m Map) View() MapView { ... }
When used as a struct field, the cloner would descend into the
underlying map[string]any and fail because it can't clone the any
(interface{}) value type. Similarly, the viewer would try to create
a MapFnOf view and fail.
Fix the cloner to check for a Clone method on the named type
before falling through to the underlying type handling.
Fix the viewer to check for a View method on named map/slice types,
so the type author can provide a purpose-built safe view that
doesn't leak raw any values. Named map/slice types without a View
method fall through to normal handling, which correctly rejects
types like map[string]any as unsupported.
Updates tailscale/corp#39502 (needed by tailscale/corp#39594)
Change-Id: Iaef0192a221e02b4b8e409c99ef8398090327744
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
|
|
Updates #18682
Change-Id: I62f6aa0de2a15ef8c1435032c6aa74a181c25f8f
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
|
|
This file was never truly necessary and has never actually been used in
the history of Tailscale's open source releases.
A Brief History of AUTHORS files
---
The AUTHORS file was a pattern developed at Google, originally for
Chromium, then adopted by Go and a bunch of other projects. The problem
was that Chromium originally had a copyright line only recognizing
Google as the copyright holder. Because Google (and most open source
projects) do not require copyright assignemnt for contributions, each
contributor maintains their copyright. Some large corporate contributors
then tried to add their own name to the copyright line in the LICENSE
file or in file headers. This quickly becomes unwieldy, and puts a
tremendous burden on anyone building on top of Chromium, since the
license requires that they keep all copyright lines intact.
The compromise was to create an AUTHORS file that would list all of the
copyright holders. The LICENSE file and source file headers would then
include that list by reference, listing the copyright holder as "The
Chromium Authors".
This also become cumbersome to simply keep the file up to date with a
high rate of new contributors. Plus it's not always obvious who the
copyright holder is. Sometimes it is the individual making the
contribution, but many times it may be their employer. There is no way
for the proejct maintainer to know.
Eventually, Google changed their policy to no longer recommend trying to
keep the AUTHORS file up to date proactively, and instead to only add to
it when requested: https://opensource.google/docs/releasing/authors.
They are also clear that:
> Adding contributors to the AUTHORS file is entirely within the
> project's discretion and has no implications for copyright ownership.
It was primarily added to appease a small number of large contributors
that insisted that they be recognized as copyright holders (which was
entirely their right to do). But it's not truly necessary, and not even
the most accurate way of identifying contributors and/or copyright
holders.
In practice, we've never added anyone to our AUTHORS file. It only lists
Tailscale, so it's not really serving any purpose. It also causes
confusion because Tailscalars put the "Tailscale Inc & AUTHORS" header
in other open source repos which don't actually have an AUTHORS file, so
it's ambiguous what that means.
Instead, we just acknowledge that the contributors to Tailscale (whoever
they are) are copyright holders for their individual contributions. We
also have the benefit of using the DCO (developercertificate.org) which
provides some additional certification of their right to make the
contribution.
The source file changes were purely mechanical with:
git ls-files | xargs sed -i -e 's/\(Tailscale Inc &\) AUTHORS/\1 contributors/g'
Updates #cleanup
Change-Id: Ia101a4a3005adb9118051b3416f5a64a4a45987d
Signed-off-by: Will Norris <will@tailscale.com>
|
|
Fixes #17870
Signed-off-by: Andrew Dunham <andrew@tailscale.com>
|
|
Extend Persist with AttestationKey to record a hardware-backed
attestation key for the node's identity.
Add a flag to tailscaled to allow users to control the use of
hardware-backed keys to bind node identity to individual machines.
Updates tailscale/corp#31269
Change-Id: Idcf40d730a448d85f07f1bebf387f086d4c58be3
Signed-off-by: Patrick O'Doherty <patrick@tailscale.com>
|
|
Updates #cleanup
Change-Id: Ic4304e909d2131a95a38b26911f49e7b1729aaef
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
|
|
s/SliceContianer/SliceContainer/g
Updates #9604
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
|
|
We had a misstep with the semantics when applying an optimization that
showed up in the roll into corp. This test ensures that case and related
cases must be retained.
Updates #9410
Updates #9601
Signed-off-by: James Tucker <james@tailscale.com>
|
