summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/util/multierr
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2026-01-23all: remove AUTHORS file and references to itWill Norris2-2/+2
This file was never truly necessary and has never actually been used in the history of Tailscale's open source releases. A Brief History of AUTHORS files --- The AUTHORS file was a pattern developed at Google, originally for Chromium, then adopted by Go and a bunch of other projects. The problem was that Chromium originally had a copyright line only recognizing Google as the copyright holder. Because Google (and most open source projects) do not require copyright assignemnt for contributions, each contributor maintains their copyright. Some large corporate contributors then tried to add their own name to the copyright line in the LICENSE file or in file headers. This quickly becomes unwieldy, and puts a tremendous burden on anyone building on top of Chromium, since the license requires that they keep all copyright lines intact. The compromise was to create an AUTHORS file that would list all of the copyright holders. The LICENSE file and source file headers would then include that list by reference, listing the copyright holder as "The Chromium Authors". This also become cumbersome to simply keep the file up to date with a high rate of new contributors. Plus it's not always obvious who the copyright holder is. Sometimes it is the individual making the contribution, but many times it may be their employer. There is no way for the proejct maintainer to know. Eventually, Google changed their policy to no longer recommend trying to keep the AUTHORS file up to date proactively, and instead to only add to it when requested: https://opensource.google/docs/releasing/authors. They are also clear that: > Adding contributors to the AUTHORS file is entirely within the > project's discretion and has no implications for copyright ownership. It was primarily added to appease a small number of large contributors that insisted that they be recognized as copyright holders (which was entirely their right to do). But it's not truly necessary, and not even the most accurate way of identifying contributors and/or copyright holders. In practice, we've never added anyone to our AUTHORS file. It only lists Tailscale, so it's not really serving any purpose. It also causes confusion because Tailscalars put the "Tailscale Inc & AUTHORS" header in other open source repos which don't actually have an AUTHORS file, so it's ambiguous what that means. Instead, we just acknowledge that the contributors to Tailscale (whoever they are) are copyright holders for their individual contributions. We also have the benefit of using the DCO (developercertificate.org) which provides some additional certification of their right to make the contribution. The source file changes were purely mechanical with: git ls-files | xargs sed -i -e 's/\(Tailscale Inc &\) AUTHORS/\1 contributors/g' Updates #cleanup Change-Id: Ia101a4a3005adb9118051b3416f5a64a4a45987d Signed-off-by: Will Norris <will@tailscale.com>
2024-04-16all: use Go 1.22 range-over-intBrad Fitzpatrick1-2/+2
Updates #11058 Change-Id: I35e7ef9b90e83cac04ca93fd964ad00ed5b48430 Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
2023-08-17all: use Go 1.21 slices, maps instead of x/exp/{slices,maps}Brad Fitzpatrick1-2/+1
Updates #8419 Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
2023-02-02util/multierr: implement Go 1.20+'s multiple error UnwrapAndrew Dunham1-11/+1
Now that Go 1.20 is released, multierr.Error can implement Unwrap() []error Updates #7123 Signed-off-by: Andrew Dunham <andrew@du.nham.ca> Change-Id: Ic28c2579de6799801836c447afbca8cdcba732cf
2023-01-27all: update copyright and license headersWill Norris2-6/+4
This updates all source files to use a new standard header for copyright and license declaration. Notably, copyright no longer includes a date, and we now use the standard SPDX-License-Identifier header. This commit was done almost entirely mechanically with perl, and then some minimal manual fixes. Updates #6865 Signed-off-by: Will Norris <will@tailscale.com>
2022-12-14util/multierr: optimize New for nil cases (#6750)Joe Tsai2-13/+43
Consider the following pattern: err1 := foo() err2 := bar() err3 := baz() return multierr.New(err1, err2, err3) If err1, err2, and err3 are all nil, then multierr.New should not allocate. Thus, modify the logic of New to count the number of distinct error values and allocate the exactly needed slice. This also speeds up non-empty error situation since repeatedly growing with append is slow. Performance: name old time/op new time/op delta Empty-24 41.8ns ± 2% 6.4ns ± 1% -84.73% (p=0.000 n=10+10) NonEmpty-24 120ns ± 3% 69ns ± 1% -42.01% (p=0.000 n=9+10) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta Empty-24 64.0B ± 0% 0.0B -100.00% (p=0.000 n=10+10) NonEmpty-24 168B ± 0% 88B ± 0% -47.62% (p=0.000 n=10+10) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta Empty-24 1.00 ± 0% 0.00 -100.00% (p=0.000 n=10+10) NonEmpty-24 3.00 ± 0% 2.00 ± 0% -33.33% (p=0.000 n=10+10) Signed-off-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@digital-static.net>
2022-12-12util/multierr: add Range (#6643)Joe Tsai2-1/+76
Errors in Go are no longer viewed as a linear chain, but a tree. See golang/go#53435. Add a Range function that iterates through an error in a pre-order, depth-first order. This matches the iteration order of errors.As in Go 1.20. This adds the logic (but currently commented out) for having Error implement the multi-error version of Unwrap in Go 1.20. It is commented out currently since it causes "go vet" to complain about having the "wrong" signature. Signed-off-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@digital-static.net>
2022-08-02all: gofmt for Go 1.19Brad Fitzpatrick1-2/+3
Updates #5210 Change-Id: Ib02cd5e43d0a8db60c1f09755a8ac7b140b670be Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
2022-03-17all: use any instead of interface{}Josh Bleecher Snyder1-1/+1
My favorite part of generics. Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
2021-11-02util/multierr: new packageJosh Bleecher Snyder2-0/+168
github.com/go-multierror/multierror served us well. But we need a few feature from it (implement Is), and it's not worth maintaining a fork of such a small module. Instead, I did a clean room implementation inspired by its API. Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>