fix(treesitter): proper tree `contains()` logic with combined injections

**Problem:** `LanguageTree:contains()` considers any range within the
start of the first tree and end of the last tree as "within" the
language tree. In the case of combined injections, this is problematic
because we only want to consider ranges within any of the combined trees
as "contained" (as opposed to any range within the entire range spanned
by all combined trees).

**Solution:** Use a more discriminative check in
`LanguageTree:contains()`.

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/runtime/lua/vim/treesitter/languagetree.lua b/runtime/lua/vim/treesitter/languagetree.lua
index 04e9710bdb..d5deb7452d 100644
--- a/runtime/lua/vim/treesitter/languagetree.lua
+++ b/runtime/lua/vim/treesitter/languagetree.lua
@@ -1287,12 +1287,13 @@ end
 local function tree_contains(tree, range)
   local tree_ranges = tree:included_ranges(false)
 
-  return Range.contains({
-    tree_ranges[1][1],
-    tree_ranges[1][2],
-    tree_ranges[#tree_ranges][3],
-    tree_ranges[#tree_ranges][4],
-  }, range)
+  for _, tree_range in ipairs(tree_ranges) do
+    if Range.contains(tree_range, range) then
+      return true
+    end
+  end
+
+  return false
 end
 
 --- Determines whether {range} is contained in the |LanguageTree|.