summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstatshomepage
path: root/runtime/colors/vim.lua
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFiles
2026-01-09fix(pum): pumborder=shadow not blending properly (#37328)zeertzjq1
Problem: Setting pumborder=shadow doesn't blend proerly. Solution: Check fconfig.shadow when setting pum_grid.blending, like what is done in check_blending().
2025-09-11fix(runtime): add "Added", "Changed", "Removed" to "vim" colorscheme (#35704)zeertzjq1
These were added to syncolor.vim in Vim patch 9.1.0016.
2025-09-09vim-patch:9.1.1742: complete: preinsert does not work well with ↵zeertzjq1
'autocomplete' (#35692) Problem: complete: preinsert does not work well with preinsert Solution: Make "preinsert" completeopt value work with autocompletion (Girish Palya) This change extends Insert mode autocompletion so that 'preinsert' also works when 'autocomplete' is enabled. Try: `:set ac cot=preinsert` See `:help 'cot'` for more details. closes: vim/vim#18213 https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/fa6fd41a943e6442c1a2ce6b0a237298b00ecca0 Co-authored-by: Girish Palya <girishji@gmail.com>
2025-08-25feat(lsp): support `textDocument/inlineCompletion`Yi Ming1
2025-08-19feat(snippet): highlight active tabstop (#35378)TheBlob421
2025-03-28vim-patch:9.1.1243: diff mode is lacking for changes within lineszeertzjq1
Problem: Diff mode's inline highlighting is lackluster. It only performs a line-by-line comparison, and calculates a single shortest range within a line that could encompass all the changes. In lines with multiple changes, or those that span multiple lines, this approach tends to end up highlighting much more than necessary. Solution: Implement new inline highlighting modes by doing per-character or per-word diff within the diff block, and highlight only the relevant parts, add "inline:simple" to the defaults (which is the old behaviour) This change introduces a new diffopt option "inline:<type>". Setting to "none" will disable all inline highlighting, "simple" (the default) will use the old behavior, "char" / "word" will perform a character/word-wise diff of the texts within each diff block and only highlight the differences. The new char/word inline diff only use the internal xdiff, and will respect diff options such as algorithm choice, icase, and misc iwhite options. indent-heuristics is always on to perform better sliding. For character highlight, a post-process of the diff results is first applied before we show the highlight. This is because a naive diff will create a result with a lot of small diff chunks and gaps, due to the repetitive nature of individual characters. The post-process is a heuristic-based refinement that attempts to merge adjacent diff blocks if they are separated by a short gap (1-3 characters), and can be further tuned in the future for better results. This process results in more characters than necessary being highlighted but overall less visual noise. For word highlight, always use first buffer's iskeyword definition. Otherwise if each buffer has different iskeyword settings we would not be able to group words properly. The char/word diffing is always per-diff block, not per line, meaning that changes that span multiple lines will show up correctly. Added/removed newlines are not shown by default, but if the user has 'list' set (with "eol" listchar defined), the eol character will be be highlighted correctly for the specific newline characters. Also, add a new "DiffTextAdd" highlight group linked to "DiffText" by default. It allows color schemes to use different colors for texts that have been added within a line versus modified. This doesn't interact with linematch perfectly currently. The linematch feature splits up diff blocks into multiple smaller blocks for better visual matching, which makes inline highlight less useful especially for multi-line change (e.g. a line is broken into two lines). This could be addressed in the future. As a side change, this also removes the bounds checking introduced to diff_read() as they were added to mask existing logic bugs that were properly fixed in vim/vim#16768. closes: vim/vim#16881 https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/9943d4790e42721a6777da9e12637aa595ba4965 Co-authored-by: Yee Cheng Chin <ychin.git@gmail.com>
2025-03-11refactor(lsp): rename `on_publish_diagnostics` parameter #32776Will Lillis1
* fix(lsp): rename `on_publish_diagnostics` parameter: result->params * fix(colors): specify local var type to address lint failure
2024-12-18vim-patch:9.1.0945: ComplMatchIns highlight doesn't end after inserted text ↵zeertzjq1
(#31628) Problem: ComplMatchIns highlight doesn't end after inserted text. Solution: Handle ComplMatchIns highlight more like search highlight. Fix off-by-one error. Handle deleting text properly. (zeertzjq) closes: vim/vim#16244 https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/f25d8f9312a24da2727671560a865888812ab8d9
2024-12-18vim-patch:9.1.0936: cannot highlight completed textzeertzjq1
Problem: cannot highlight completed text Solution: (optionally) highlight auto-completed text using the ComplMatchIns highlight group (glepnir) closes: vim/vim#16173 https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/6a38aff218f5b99a1aed7edaa357df24b9092734 Co-authored-by: glepnir <glephunter@gmail.com>
2024-06-15vim-patch:9.1.0476: Cannot see matched text in popup menuzeertzjq1
Problem: Cannot see matched text in popup menu Solution: Introduce 2 new highlighting groups: PmenuMatch and PmenuMatchSel (glepnir) closes: vim/vim#14694 https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/40c1c3317d92f8c2adadf744fab72e4458e2a9fa Co-authored-by: glepnir <glephunter@gmail.com>
2024-06-14fix(highlight): add `StatusLineTerm`/`StatusLineTermNC` to `:color vim` (#29313)Evgeni Chasnovski1
Problem: both `StatusLineTerm`/`StatusLineTermNC` are now explicitly used, but `:color vim` does not set them to the values used in Vim. This might be fine if `:color vim` is treated as "the state of default color scheme prior the big update", but it seems to be better treated as "Vim's default color scheme" (how it is documented in its header). Solution: add `StatusLineTerm`/`StatusLineTermNC` definitions to 'runtime/colors/vim.lua'. Use explicit foreground colors ('Whte'/'Black') instead of `guifg=bg` used in source, as the latter caused some problems in the past (if `Normal` is not defined, `nvim_set_hl()` can't recognize `'bg'` as the foreground value). Also realign the rest of the background conditional highlight groups.
2024-03-19fix(treesitter): document more standard highlight groupsChristian Clason1
Problem: Not all standard treesitter groups are documented. Solution: Document them all (without relying on fallback); add default link for new `*.builtin` groups to `Special` and `@keyword.type` to `Structure`. Remove `@markup.environment.*` which only made sense for LaTeX.
2024-02-15vim-patch:9.1.0106: Visual highlight hard to read with 'termguicolors'zeertzjq1
Problem: Visual highlight hard to read with 'termguicolors' (Maxim Kim) Solution: Set Visual GUI foreground to black (with background=light) and lightgrey (with background=dark) (Maxim Kim) fixes: vim/vim#14024 closes: vim/vim#14025 https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/34e4a05d02a016fe230495be8f6c60ddd56f9567 Co-authored-by: Maxim Kim <habamax@gmail.com>
2024-02-15vim-patch:9.1.0068: Visual highlighting can still be improvedzeertzjq1
Problem: Visual highlighting can still be improved Solution: Update Visual highlighting for 8 color terminals, use uniform grey highlighting for dark and light bg (Maxim Kim) Update terminal Visual 1. Use `ctermbg=Grey ctermfg=Black` for both dark and light This uniforms Visual highlighting between default dark and light colors And should work for vim usually detecting light background for terminals with black/dark background colors. Previously used `ctermfg=White` leaks `cterm=bold` if available colors are less than 16. 2. Use `term=reverse cterm=reverse ctermbg=NONE ctermfg=NONE` for terminals reporting less than 8 colors available If the terminal has less than 8 colors, grey just doesn't work right closes: vim/vim#13940 https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/59bafc8171b08cf326ed40ccb4ee917f9643290e Co-authored-by: Maxim Kim <habamax@gmail.com>
2024-01-29vim-patch:9.1.0061: UX of visual highlighting can be improved (#27256)Evgeni Chasnovski1
Problem: UX of visual highlighting can be improved Solution: Improve readibility of visual highlighting, by setting better foreground and background colors The default visual highlighting currently is nice in that it overlays the actual syntax highlighting by using a separate distinct background color. However, this can cause hard to read text, because the contrast between the actual syntax element and the background color is way too low. That is an issue, that has been bothering colorschemes authors for quite some time so much, that they are defining the Visual highlighting group to use a separate foreground and background color, so that the syntax highlighting vanishes, but the text remains readable (ref: vim/colorschemesvim/vim#250) So this is an attempt to perform the same fix for the default Visual highlighting and just use a default foreground and background color instead of using reverse. I also removed the hard-coded changes to the Visual highlighting in init_highlight. It's not quite clear to me, why those were there and not added directly to the highlighting_init_<dark|light> struct. closes: vim/vim#13663 related: vim/colorschemes#250 https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/e6d8b4662ddf9356da53f56e363b67b524fd8825 Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
2024-01-25fix(runtime): update 'vim' color scheme to use new tree-sitter groupsEvgeni Chasnovski1
2023-12-21refactor(runtime): rewrite 'vim' color scheme in LuaEvgeni Chasnovski1
Problem: Bundled 'vim' color scheme is written in Vimscript which implicitly assumes that the file is ported from Vim. This is not the case, at it is currently the Neovim's way of providing backward compatibility for color schemes. Solution: Rewrite it in Lua to indicate that this runtime file comes from Neovim.